Under reasonable suspicion, what action can law enforcement take with a juvenile?

When considering the concept of "reasonable suspicion," law enforcement officers are permitted to take specific actions when they believe a person may be involved in criminal activity. This standard is less than probable cause but requires specific and articulable facts that suggest a person is connected to crime.

The correct choice indicates that under reasonable suspicion, law enforcement may conduct a "stop and frisk" of a juvenile. This action involves two key components: stopping the individual to ask questions and, if the officer has a reasonable belief that the person may be armed and dangerous, conducting a limited search of outer clothing for weapons. This practice, which is permissible under the Fourth Amendment, allows officers to ensure their safety while also addressing suspicious behavior.

This option aligns with established legal precedents regarding the treatment of individuals, including juveniles, under reasonable suspicion. This approach balances the need for public safety and the rights of individuals, allowing officers to address potential threats without overstepping legal boundaries.

The other options—only stopping, arresting, or indefinitely detaining the juvenile—do not fully capture the nuances of reasonable suspicion. While a stop could occur, the additional action of a frisk is justified only under specific circumstances. Arresting a juvenile typically requires probable cause, a higher standard than reasonable suspicion